Boginfo

  
 
Museum Tusculanums Forlag bruger cookies for at huske dine indstillinger. Ved at bruge sitet accepterer du dette. Accepter cookies
 
Bookmark and Share      Nyhedsbrev   Print siden  

Ober, Josiah
Living Freely as a Slave of the Law.
Notes on Why Sokrates Lives in Athens

, e-publikation
ISBN 978-87-635-0325-9
s. 541-552 i:
True

27 DKK  4 $   4 €


▼ Din mening

From the beginning of the article:
Among Mogens Hansen’s many Athenian interests, one individual and one political value stand out: the individual is Sokrates and the value is freedom, especially in its “negative” sense of “freedom to pursue one’s personal goals”. Here I will seek to illuminate, with a philosophical torch assembled largely from Hansen’s historical investigations of Athenian legal procedure, a few small corners of a big question about Sokrates and freedom: Does the acceptance by Sokrates (i.e. the literary figure depicted in Plato’s Apologia and Crito: hereafter simply “Sokrates”), of communal obligations he owed as a citizen, unduly compromise his freedom as an individual? Linked to this normative question is a historical question about Sokrates’ identity: How Athenian, in terms of embracing values implicit in Athenian legal and political practices, was Sokrates? I will suggest that both Sokrates’ “Athenian-ness” and his idiosyncrasy bear on the problem of his ethical obligations to the state. I make three main points: 1. Although Sokrates regarded other polities as substantively “better”, Athens was the right polis for Sokrates because (inter alia) the procedural emphasis of Athenian law rendered a commitment to obeying the laws fully compatible with the freedom of Sokrates as an individual to choose and pursue his distinctive life goals. And so Athens never confronted Sokrates with a hard choice between his freedom of conscience and his duty as a citizen. 2. A hypothetical law against philosophizing would not confront Sokrates with a hard choice, because he would regard such a law as formally invalid. 3. When he disobeyed the order of the Thirty to arrest Leon of Salamis, Sokrates was not breaking the law because the order lacked authority under the lawcode that Sokrates regarded as being in force at the time.

 
Emneområde | Græsk-romersk oldtid |
Emneord | Athen | Filosofihistorie | Love |
Specifikt emneord | Bystater |
Biograferet person | Sokrates |
Periode | Klassisk oldtid |
Sprog | Engelsk |


Indlæg offentliggøres med navn og e-mail. Forlaget forbeholder sig ret til at redigere og udelade indlæg.





Museum Tusculanums ForlagRådhusvej 192920 Charlottenlund
Tlf. 3234 1414info@mtp.dk
CVR: 8876 8418

Bank: Danske Bank, 1092 København KBIC: DABADKKK
Reg.nr.: 1551Kontonr.: 000 5252 520IBAN: DK98 3000 000 5252520

www.mtp.dk er en e-mærket netbutik, og derfor har du altid adgang til e-mærkets gratis Forbrugerhotline, når du handler hos os.

©2004–2020 Museum Tusculanums Forlag. Alle rettigheder forbeholdes. Ved brug af dette site anerkender og accepterer du, at indholdet på dette site tilhører MTF eller tredjemand fra hvem MTF afleder sine rettigheder, samt at indholdet er ophavsretligt beskyttet og ikke må anvendes uden forudgående skriftlig samtykke fra MTF. Du anerkender og accepterer yderligere, at varemærker, kendetegn, varenavne, logoer og produkter vist på dette site, er beskyttet og ikke må anvendes uden forudgående skriftligt samtykke fra MTF.


Handelsbetingelser Juridiske betingelser Behandling af personlige oplysninger